<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blog of Julian Andres Klode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juliank.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Ubuntu Member &#124; Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe &#124; Developer</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Python Speed: Getting the first part of a string by elghinn</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/python-speed-getting-the-first-part-of-a-string/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>elghinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-193</guid>
		<description>If the string in "a" is a bit different, resultat is different too O:)

In [1]: a = 'ijtgvtrVC/ytrvyvcytv/vcytvcyt'

In [2]: timeit a.split('/', 1)[0]
1000000 loops, best of 3: 847 ns per loop

In [3]: timeit a.split('/')[0]
1000000 loops, best of 3: 850 ns per loop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the string in &#8220;a&#8221; is a bit different, resultat is different too O <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In [1]: a = &#8216;ijtgvtrVC/ytrvyvcytv/vcytvcyt&#8217;</p>
<p>In [2]: timeit a.split(&#8217;/', 1)[0]<br />
1000000 loops, best of 3: 847 ns per loop</p>
<p>In [3]: timeit a.split(&#8217;/')[0]<br />
1000000 loops, best of 3: 850 ns per loop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What will be in debimg 0.1 by Co přinese debimg 0.1 (Debian-linux.cz)</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/what-will-be-in-debimg-01/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Co přinese debimg 0.1 (Debian-linux.cz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-184</guid>
		<description>[...] Debian. Připravovaná verze 0.1 bude podle autora důležitým vývojovým milníkem a nabídne řadu novinek proti aktuální verzi 0.0.3: inteligentní přerozdělování balíčků mezi více instalačními [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debian. Připravovaná verze 0.1 bude podle autora důležitým vývojovým milníkem a nabídne řadu novinek proti aktuální verzi 0.0.3: inteligentní přerozdělování balíčků mezi více instalačními [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python Speed: &#8216;x in list&#8217; vs &#8216;x in set&#8217; by Paulo José da Silva e Silva</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/python-speed-x-in-list-vs-x-in-set/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo José da Silva e Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Actually search a hash table with a O(1) operation is the hash function hashes well. A search in O(log n) is usually associated to sorted lists or (balanced) binary trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually search a hash table with a O(1) operation is the hash function hashes well. A search in O(log n) is usually associated to sorted lists or (balanced) binary trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python Speed: &#8216;x in list&#8217; vs &#8216;x in set&#8217; by Lamby</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/python-speed-x-in-list-vs-x-in-set/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Err, what? Searching for an item in a hashtable is O(1) not O(log(n)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err, what? Searching for an item in a hashtable is O(1) not O(log(n)).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python Speed: &#8216;x in list&#8217; vs &#8216;x in set&#8217; by curious</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/python-speed-x-in-list-vs-x-in-set/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-181</guid>
		<description>This is of course expected behaviour.
Since a set is a sort of dictionary. (Hashtable)
Therefor searching for an item in a set is log(n) instead of n.
has_key is a dictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is of course expected behaviour.<br />
Since a set is a sort of dictionary. (Hashtable)<br />
Therefor searching for an item in a set is log(n) instead of n.<br />
has_key is a dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Responding to e-mails with Evolution by gouki</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/responding-to-e-mails-with-evolution/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>gouki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-171</guid>
		<description>It's actually fairly easy to set up.

Start the 'New account' Wizard. On the Identity part, fill in your name and @ubuntu.com email address. -Forward-

Make sure 'None' is selected on 'Receiving Email' - Forward -

On the 'Sending eMail' part, use an SMTP (for example) server you have credentials on. Here you can fill in the options just like you would for your @jak-linux.org address.

That's all you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually fairly easy to set up.</p>
<p>Start the &#8216;New account&#8217; Wizard. On the Identity part, fill in your name and @ubuntu.com email address. -Forward-</p>
<p>Make sure &#8216;None&#8217; is selected on &#8216;Receiving Email&#8217; - Forward -</p>
<p>On the &#8216;Sending eMail&#8217; part, use an SMTP (for example) server you have credentials on. Here you can fill in the options just like you would for your @jak-linux.org address.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Responding to e-mails with Evolution by Julian Andres Klode</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/responding-to-e-mails-with-evolution/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Andres Klode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-170</guid>
		<description>@Simon: This will be done. I'm currently just "hacking" in the functionality. Later, I will cleanup the code and merge it into master. BTW, there are no packages available yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon: This will be done. I&#8217;m currently just &#8220;hacking&#8221; in the functionality. Later, I will cleanup the code and merge it into master. BTW, there are no packages available yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Responding to e-mails with Evolution by Simon</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/responding-to-e-mails-with-evolution/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I vote for an unified package for building both Debian and Ubuntu images, since it makes it far easier to support both distributions without the need for lots of chroots and general script hackery.

For example, the fact that debootstrap supports both makes it really easy for one of my cronjobs to prepare autobuilt cross-binutils packages for all known variants of Debian and Ubuntu. It would be way harder if I had to run an Ubuntu chroot in order to set up the five or so temporary Ubuntu chroots in which the actual package builds take place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for an unified package for building both Debian and Ubuntu images, since it makes it far easier to support both distributions without the need for lots of chroots and general script hackery.</p>
<p>For example, the fact that debootstrap supports both makes it really easy for one of my cronjobs to prepare autobuilt cross-binutils packages for all known variants of Debian and Ubuntu. It would be way harder if I had to run an Ubuntu chroot in order to set up the five or so temporary Ubuntu chroots in which the actual package builds take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Responding to e-mails with Evolution by Peter Nelson</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/responding-to-e-mails-with-evolution/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Yes, just set up the address as a new account, and leave the receiving server type as 'None'.

Evolution should then be able to automatically choose the address to send from, or you can choose manually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, just set up the address as a new account, and leave the receiving server type as &#8216;None&#8217;.</p>
<p>Evolution should then be able to automatically choose the address to send from, or you can choose manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Responding to e-mails with Evolution by GNa</title>
		<link>http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/responding-to-e-mails-with-evolution/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>GNa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliank.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I have also some alias addresses in Evolution.
My setup involves all the addresses i use, but i have left the receiving part on NONE.

So i have my.name@ and administrator@ accounts but the second one is only a SMTP account. When i get a mail addressed to administrator@ then the reply is done with the settings of administrator@ account. Try it for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also some alias addresses in Evolution.<br />
My setup involves all the addresses i use, but i have left the receiving part on NONE.</p>
<p>So i have my.name@ and administrator@ accounts but the second one is only a SMTP account. When i get a mail addressed to administrator@ then the reply is done with the settings of administrator@ account. Try it for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
