APT 1.1.8 to 1.1.10 – going “faster”

Not only do I keep incrementing version numbers faster than ever before, APT also keeps getting faster. But not only that, it also has some bugs fixed and the cache is now checked with a hash when opening.

Important fix for 1.1.6 regression

Since APT 1.1.6, APT uses the configured xz compression level. Unfortunately, the default was set to 9, which requires 674 MiB of RAM, compared to the 94 MiB required at level 6.

This caused the test suite to fail on the Ubuntu autopkgtest servers, but I thought it was just some temporary hickup on their part, and so did not look into it for the 1.1.7, 1.1.8, and 1.1.9 releases.  When the Ubuntu servers finally failed with 1.1.9 again (they only started building again on Monday it seems), I noticed something was wrong.

Enter git bisect. I created a script that compiles the APT source code and runs a test with ulimit for virtual and resident memory set to 512 (that worked in 1.1.5), and let it ran, and thus found out the reason mentioned above.

The solution: APT now defaults to level 6.

New Features

APT 1.1.8 introduces /usr/lib/apt/apt-helper cat-file which can be used to read files compressed by any compressor understood by APT. It is used in the recent apt-file experimental release, and serves to prepare us for a future in which files on the disk might be compressed with a different compressor (such as LZ4 for Contents files, this will improve rred speed on them by factor 7).

David added a feature that enables servers to advertise that they do not want APT to download and use some Architecture: all contents when they include all in their list of architectures. This is to allow archives to drop Architecture: all packages from the architecture-specific content files, to avoid redundant data and (thus) improve the performance of apt-file.

Buffered writes

APT 1.1.9 introduces buffered writing for rred, reducing the runtime by about 50% on a slowish SSD, and maybe more on HDDs. The 1.1.9 release is a bit buggy and might mess up things when a write syscall is interrupted, this is fixed in 1.1.10.

Cache generation improvements

APT 1.1.9 and APT 1.1.10 improve the cache generation algorithms in several ways: Switching a lookup table from std::map to std::unordered_map, providing an inline isspace_ascii() function, and inlining the tolower_ascii() function which are tiny functions that are called a lot.

APT 1.1.10 also switches the cache’s hash function to the DJB hash function and increases the default hash table sizes to the smallest prime larger than 15000, namely 15013. This reduces the average bucket size from 6.5 to 4.5. We might increase this further in the future.

Checksum for the cache, but no more syncs

Prior to APT 1.1.10 writing the cache was a multi-part process:

  1. Write the the cache to a temporary file with the dirty bit set to true
  2. Call fsync() to sync the cache
  3. Write a new header with the dirty bit set to false
  4. Call fsync() to sync the new header
  5. (Rename the temporary file to the target name)

The last step was obviously not needed, as we could easily live with an intact cache that has its dirty field set to false, as we can just rebuild it.

But what matters more is step 2. Synchronizing the entire 40 or 50 MB takes some time. On my HDD system, it consumed 56% of the entire cache generation time, and on my SSD system, it consumed 25% of the time.

APT 1.1.10 does not sync the cache at all. It now embeds a hashsum (adler32 for performance reasons) in the cache. This helps ensure that no matter what parts of the cache are written in case of some failure somewhere, we can still detect a failure with reasonable confidence (and even more errors than before).

This means that cache generation is now much faster for a lot of people. On the bad side, commands like apt-cache show that previously took maybe 10 ms to execute can now take about 80 ms.

Please report back on your performance experience with 1.1.10 release, I’m very interested to see if that works reasonably for other people. And if you have any other idea how to solve the issue, I’d be interested to hear them (all data needs to be written before the header with dirty=0 is written, but we don’t want to sync the data).

Future work

We seem to have a lot of temporary (?) std::string objects during the cache generation, accounting for about 10% of the run time. I’m thinking of introducing a string_view class similar to the one proposed for C++17 and make use of that.

I also thought about calling posix_fadvise() before starting to parse files, but the cache generation process does not seem to spend a lot of its time in system calls (even with all caches dropped before the run), so I don’t think this will improve things.

If anyone has some other suggestions or patches for performance stuff, let me know.


9 thoughts on “APT 1.1.8 to 1.1.10 – going “faster”

  1. I really appreciate the work you’re doing to improve apt’s performance, but I’ve one question regarding the xz compression and memory usage: What happens on systems which don’t have 512MB RAM available (may it be because the have less RAM overall or simply less free RAM)?

    1. It’s just the Compression code which is only used by apt-ftparchive generate. And the 512 was just a value for testing, I’m not sure how much apt-ftparchive will need in practice – probably less, because an xz compressor at level 6 only needs less than 100 MB. It spawns multiple compressors in parallel, so people with less memory could simply only use one compression format.

  2. Is it really a good idea to optimize for write performance, when reads of the data are 1. More frequent and 2. Interactive? I’m not so sure. But introducing a hash check is likely to be a good idea anyway. Is the apt-cache slowdown only due to hash checking?

    Many thanks for your work. Updates had been unbearably slow (and room-warming) since apt-file started using the apt update mechanism. They are no longer so. In my (unmeasured) experience, the Contents rred phase is the slowest part, and is the only one that still burns enough cpu to fire up the fans on my laptop. Looking forward to the replacing of gzip there!

    1. I figured: In addition to giving us data integrity, it also gives us a speed up for writes. There are some bugs though: We sometimes calculate the hash sum more often then we have to (if pkgcache.bin is fine, it’s only calculated once; if it’s not it can be calculated up to three times).

    2. Reads of the data are not necessarily more frequent. If you repeatedly do an update followed by an upgrade, you will read the compressed data either 0 or 1 time (0 in the case of contents, 1 in the case of package metadata).

      Does any means exist to disable the fetching of contents files entirely?

  3. Hi jak.

    I’m have a NAS that tbm gave me (it’s an armel system with 128MB of RAM total) and it would be nice if something could be made about choosing the level of xz compression to something lower.

    Also, as an aside, what does rred stand for? 🙂

    Please, keep up with the excellent work! Especially for lower powered devices like mine and with notebooks, performance improvements are especially welcome!

    1. You cab configure that since 1.1.6 by setting Apt::Compressor::xz::CompressArg:: to “-6”, or a similarly named option. Looking at apt-config dump should show you the correct name.

Comments are closed.